Sen McGlinn's blog

                                  Reflections on the Bahai teachings and community

Images of hate

The Iranian media are full of anti-Bahai propaganda, much of it state-sponsored. New items are generated each week, and reproduced on dozens of sites. The stories are usually about the Bahais as servants of Russian/British colonialism, agents of zionism, spies for Israel and so forth: the usual fabrications recycled. The stories are often accompanied by images which represent the supposed Bahai threat to Iranian society. I’ve made something of a ‘stamp collection’ of these images, with the thought that there might be a research paper in this, for me or someone else.

Some of the images lower on the page are offensive.

The Greatest Name with a cracked face is from the “mid-night” blog, which is not very active, and has copied a story that is being relayed on many Iranian sites. It says there is increasing Bahai activity using satellite media, and that Bahai missionaries continue to teach the Faith, even in prison. The Bahais are said to be supported by Israel, and to call international attention to the supposed violation of the human rights of minorities in Iran. However since the Bahai sect is not considered a religion, but rather deviant, it is right that it should be restricted.

 
 

This ‘pied piper’ image is one of the more popular representations of the Bahai threat. I copied this one from Patoghu forum, 24 November 2009. the story that goes with it is the same as the one above.

The image originally represented a Knight Templar, in a painting by Russian artist Valyeriya Stoylova.
 


 
 
 
 

This image seeks to associate the Bahai Faith — an Iranian religion with a cosmopolitan world-view – with the United States. I found it used on friendfeed, on 29 November, 2009.
 
 
 

The ‘Rasputin’ image was used by an individual posting to the ‘Negar’ discussion forum, 11 February 2010, to illustrate a post alleging Bahai links to Zionism, the British, Israel, and the Pahlavi regime; the author compounds anti-Bahaism with antisemitism.
 
 
 
 

The octopus image is used in an article about the Iranian Bahais’ supposed control of the property and construction market, written in 2007. It appears to have been taken from anti-semitic literature, since the octopus wears the Star of David and is “seated” in North America.

The same web page uses the ‘two faced’ image (left) to represent Bahai “front companies” which are supposedly operating throughout Iran.

The wolves illustrate a story about foreign and Bahai influence on Iran’s domestic media (!), on “voice of the revolution” blog, March 1, 2011. It would appear that the Iranian publications concerned have no real relation to Bahais at all; rather this is the use of the label “Bahai” by one faction in Iran to smeer a rival faction, and demand that the authorities crack down on their opponents.
 
speculatorsThe image of building supplies, with the star of David and the word “Baha’i,” accompanies a story about a number of Bahais in Shiraz being arrested for speculating in trade supplies and equipment, and so causing recent price rises. The story appears on the site of the “Watcher’s Institute,” which is dedicated to detecting threats to the Iranian Way of Life. (Page accessed April 8, 2013; page dated November 17, 2012)
 
Not all the images used are blatantly images of hate at the level of cartoons. What are we to make of this ‘hand and eye’ image? Is the reference to the Masonic movement perhaps? It accompanied an article on the Bahais in the Pahlavi era, in Aftab magazine, 14 February 2010. However I have seen something similar in Iran, as designs on copper hands whose five fingers are said to represent the five pillars of Islam.
 
 
 
 
 
 
A blog purporting to survey the current status of the Bahais in Iran, dated February 2009, uses the ‘pied piper’ image above, and also this image of a dossier being handed over between shadowy figures, to illustrate the supposed Bahai involvement in espionage. The seal of the US Department of Defence, and the Israeli flag, are in the background. The text claims that, in the previous six months the Bahais have been concentrating their espionage activities on the security forces, missile sites and Iran’s internal affairs. It does not explain how a community that is barred from employment in the public service and the armed services, and is under constant surveillance, has been able to achieve this without leaving any evidence of its activities.


 
The image of a fiend in Hell (presumably directing the Bahais towards the lower-level accomodations), illustrates a blog showing the Bahai holy places and historical sites that have been destroyed in Iran. One wonders why the text ‘Bahais in hell’ is in English.

The ‘Hidden Watcher’ image was used, along with the ‘pied piper’ image, to illustrate an article on Tebyan on 7 March 2010, listing Shiah theological objections to the Bahai Faith. The hidden watcher is placed by a paragraph that says that Bahais claim that the Bab and Baha’u'llah are the promised ones of Islam, whereas the Shiah say that the twelfth Imam, born in the second century (and, they believe, still alive ‘in occultation’ pending his return) is the promised one. So what at first glance is an image saying ‘the Bahais are lurking in the corners’ may be intended to say ‘the Hidden Imam is aware of everything.’ Like the ‘hand an eye’ image above, it may be a sign of Shiah orthodoxy.

This ‘ghoul’ image was used by Fars News Agency, to accompany a story about the Bahais on 24 February, 2010, but I have seen it quite often before. In this case the Bahais are accused of spreading their faith by selling disposable cups in the bazaar, bearing images of cartoon characters from other countries.
 
 
 
 

The “puppet” image represents Abdu’l-Baha as an Israeli and British puppet. Abdu’l-Baha, who lived in Palestine for most of his life, died in 1921, long before Israel existed. The photograph appears to be taken in the United States during his visit there. The story that accompanies the image, dated 28 December 2009, claims that the ‘green wave’ movement protesting the Iranian elections is a Bahai movement, and that Bahais were behind the Ashura protests in which several people were killed.

The “Kremlin” image shows Abdu’l-Baha and Baha’u'llah (cropped from the version shown here) with British, American and Israeli flags. It is part of the web page header for an anti-Bahai site called the Bahai Room. Not only does it contain manipulated photographs of Baha’u'llah, it has some sort of malware that tries to access your computer – blocked in my case by Avast! Explore this one at your own risk.

The skull in red and blue headdress accompanies a story on the official Fars News site (15 April 2010), which alleges that the activities of the misguided sects of Wahhabis and Bahais have increased. The technique is a create a vague sense of alarm in the populace, about ‘activities’ which are not detailed. The images that accompany such vague stories convey a lot of the meaning. In this image, the skull is immediately readable. The red head-dress represents Arabs in general, and the Saudi government in particular; the blue head-dress is the colour of the Israeli flag and shows the Star of David. The crown of thorns is an allusion to Christianity. Fars News borrowed the image from the “wahhabiun” blog, which deals in both anti-Bahai and anti-Saudi propaganda, but used this particular image to accompany a story claiming that the Wahhabi sect was established by the British. The text says that Wahhabism is the dark side of Islam.

Naturally Wahhabi Islam, the official religion of Saudi Arabia, has no connection with either Israel or the Bahai Faith, yet in the past two years Bahai and Wahhabi have often been mentioned together in the government-sponsored press in Iran — too often for it to be anything but a centrally decided policy. (The image was used again on April 7, 2013). The idea is that by grouping together the most progressive and most conservative of religious movements, the Bahai and the Wahhabi, their names will have negative connotations for those somewhat inclined to progressive or to conservative approaches to religion.

The four images presented below appeared alternately in an animated window on a blog (28 March 2010) dedicated to showing that the ‘green wave’ reform movement in Iran is a zionist plot or worse. The article above the animation is about a satanist cultural invasion of Iran by means of Lord of the Rings and ‘new’ styles of music (rock and jazz being included among the new styles), all orchestrated by Hollywood, Zionism and and the Satanists. The images appear under a heading “Death to the misguided Bahai sect,” and the words below read “End hypocracy.” The two wolves and the gremlin are immediately readable, but what are we supposed to understand from the woman with not a wisp of hair showing under the chador? A closer look reveals she is wearing lipstick! That explains it.

 
 
 

 

The “glowing globe’ image, from the blog of the “Jasmine Foundation,” accompanies an article entitled Bahaism and the Pahlavi Regime, which alleges that Bahais cooperated with the Pahlavi government. Bahais obey their governments wherever they live, but the Iranian Bahais were nevertheless heavily persecuted under the Pahlavis: their schools and institutes were closed, their national centre and a number of cemeteries were destroyed, a number of Bahais were killed and many fled to other countries. At that time the Hojjatiyeh – the group that has achieved ascendency within the Iranian regime in the past few years – was cooperating with the Pahlavis, and specifically with SAVAK, because the Hojjatiyeh and SAVAK had a common cause in persecuting the Bahais. This image, like the “pied piper”, the “hidden watcher” and the blue hand with an eye, seems to be saying that Bahais have access to dangerous supernatural knowledge or powers.

eyeofzion This image from Aviny.com (accessed 8 April 2013) heads a contents page, listing anti-bahai materials on subjects such as the opinions of senior Shiah clerics about the Bahai Faith, the Bahais and economic sabotage, a bibliography of anti-Bahai literature, and so forth. The message of the image is that Bahais are Israeli spies. The Persian text in the image reads “Bahaism” however the word use is not deliberately offensive in the way that “Bahaism” in English would be a deliberate provocation.

The ‘bound figure’ image is somewhat different, in that it suggests that Bahais are victims rather than a threat. It accompanies a story (Nik-nama site, January 25 2011) that Bahais marry their close relatives “such as daughters, sisters, aunts and uncles.”

This is a common theme in Iranian anti-bahai propaganda. I have translated an explanation of the “forbidden degrees of marriage” applicable for Bahais, written by Abdu’l-Baha, on this blog. It says in brief that the principle is “distance is nearer than nearness,” but no one definition of the forbidden degrees can be given that would be suitable for all times and places, therefore the matter is left to the Bahai administration to determine, and modify, as circumstances require.

Finally, a little light relief. In October 2009 a new image appeared at the Javan News site. The story that goes with the image just says that the spying activities of the Bahais are increasing, without saying how a community excluded from education, government jobs, large corporations and the police and military can spy on anything, or why Israel should tell its spies not to pretend to be Shiah and infiltrate something, but rather to say they are Bahais so they can be subject to continuous surveillance from the intelligence ministry, frequent home searches and the confiscation of their computers, and be deprived of access to higher education, pensions and even basic human rights. The latest threat to Iran’s national security, if we are to believe this image, is Bahais lurking in folded beach umbrellas!
Bahai beach umbrellas

The photograph appears to be taken at dawn. Clearly, when the sun comes up, it’s going to be a long day of sun, sand and sects on the beaches of Iran.

[A survey using Google image search, on the words فرقه بهائیت (Bahai sect) with the settings "past week" and "past year," run on April 8, 2013, showed that old images are still being recycled, quite arbitrarily (the image is the skull in red and blue headdress, discussed above, while the story is about Bahais supposedly committing incest). However my subjective impression is that the volume of hate images found by Google is considerably less than 3 years ago. I do not know whether this may be due to Google filtering offensive images more effectively. ]

7 Responses to “Images of hate”

  1. Sen said

    I’ve had one comment on this, specifically with respect to the fiend directing the Bahais to the lower levels of Hell. Unfortunately it was written in a google-translate English, but the person concerned has posted it in Persian on his own blog, which is called Anti-bahai. You may guess what it contains then. For those who can read Persian, it is here:
    http://anti-baha.blogfa.com/post-42.aspx

    I replied to him by email:

    I will not post your comment. Every piece of information it contains is
    incorrect ! There’s not even one correct fact. You must clear your mind
    from the pollution of lies, and seek authentic sources of information,
    because the pollution in your mind will also affect your soul.

    The Bahais are not banned from teaching Jews: many Jews have become
    Bahais. Many Jews and Zoroastrians in Iran have become Bahais too.

    Bahais do not teach in Israel, so when I was in Israel, staying with a
    Christian family, I did not try to interest them in the Bahai Faith. I
    would have acted in just the same way if my hosts had been Muslims or
    Druze or Jews or Atheists.

    The book called Dolgorukov’s memoirs that circulates in Iran is a
    falsehood, a trick, and any sensible person should realise it must
    be. Why would a Russian diplomat write in Persian? Why is the Russian text
    no where to be found? Why did it not emerge until 1943 in Mashhad? And why
    do his real memoirs and dispatches (reports to the Russian government),
    written in Russian, not agree at all with the fake ones?

    See especially page 15 in:
    http://www.brli.org/storage/debunking-Persian.pdf

    or see the wikipedia article:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_Baha%27i_involvement_with_
    other_powers

    which says:

    The memoir states that Dolgorukov used to attend gatherings of Hakím Ahmad
    Gílání, where he would meet Bahá’u'lláh. However, Gílání had died in 1835,
    which was three years before Dolgorukov’s arrival in the country. There
    are numerous other errors relating to the dates and times of events that
    the memoir describes; the memoir describes events after the death of
    personages, or when the people involved were young children, or when they
    were in different parts of the world.[19]…

    On Freemasonry, I was reading a freemason journal from 1889 just two days
    ago. If you read French you can see it for yourself, at the bottom of this
    page http://tinyurl.com/freemasonbabi

    The man concludes:

    “Universal Freemasonry not only has nothing in common with Babism, in
    respect to its origin, its principles or its goal; it [Freemasonry] is
    bound to combat Babism as an immoral and anti-humane institution. …
    Universal Freemasonry, as the protector of humanity, must resolve to
    destroy this obstacle which temporarily impedes universal progress.”

    from
    Les Babis de la Perse et al Francmac,onnerie Universelle, par A.
    Hubert-Gourrier
    in

    La Chaîne d’union de Paris : journal de la maçonnerie universelle …
    July-August 1889 , pp. 239-248 available online at gallica.bnf.fr =
    Bibliotheque nationale de France

    Try to clear all these lies out of your mind. It would be better to
    know nothing, than to have such things in your head

    Sen

  2. Negar.Int said

    Hi,
    I’m NegarClubs.IR Admin.

    I think you need read more about this, let your mind fly in fact sky.

    history as documents show the Bahai made by Russian & British as a Zionists; also nothing about anti jews, everything is about antisemitism,we think “JEWS NOT ZIONISTS” !

    See here > http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/

    At the end, remember “Negar Clubs” is Independent Forum and we try to be neutral. I think this information usefull for you.

  3. Sen said

    I have frequently heard the claim that the Russian or British made the Bahai Faith, and have asked for evidence. I have never found anyone with any evidence that stands up to examination. Two important pieces of “evidence” are downright frauds. There is the Dolgorukov memoirs, supposedly written in Persian by a Russian diplomat, explaining how he established Babism in Persia at a time when he was in fact the Russian representative in the Hague, and how he later helped Baha’u'llah found the Bahai Faith, at a time when Baha’u'llah was dead! It is a tissue of lies, written apparently in Mashhad in the 1940s.

    The second is much less detailed, a claim by Firaydun Adamiyyat, that Mulla Husayn, the Báb’s first disciple, was really a British agent who was recruited by Arthur Conolly, a British intelligence officer. Adamiyyat claimed that the evidence was printed in Conolly’s Journey to the North of India, but he just made that up – there is no such source. The claim was removed in later editions of Adamiyyat’s book, but it still echoes around the internet like the story of the alligators in the sewers of New York.

    To normal and rational people, the idea of the Russian or British intelligence services cooperating on anything, let alone on making up a religion in Persia, and then getting thousands of Persians so committed to it that they would lay down their lives for it, is an obvious absurdity. To understand why these silly stories are not instantly dismissed, one must know something about Persian popular culture of the 80 years or so (the stories did not appear at the time the Babi and Bahai faiths were founded, they are made up later). One source on this is Ahmad Ashraf’s article on “Conspiracy theories and the Persian Mind.” That puts the “foreign origin” conspiracy theories regarding the Babi and Bahai Faiths in the context of a people generally prone to explain the decline of their culture and nation by blaming it on machinations of hostile foreign powers and secret organizations.

    I read the Iranian press – I know that the Bahais and anyone else the writer does not like are called “Zionists” with a complete disregard for facts. So in most cases, the target is not Zionism: the target is someone the writer doesn’t like (it can be a Bahai, a human rights lawyer, or a politician), and the label “Zionist” is attached to them.

    In much the same way, people such as Ebadi and Hoveyda are labeled Bahais in the Iranian media, without a shred of evidence. And (to share the blame around), Hamas publicists label Fatah leaders as Bahais.

    There is probably nothing that can be done to change this cultural soup of slanders and urban myths in the short term. What is needed is an education system that teaches children an evidence-based critical approach, that does not simply accept any silly story, but instead investigates the truth, and, following from that, the abandonment of all kinds of prejudice. The phenomenon of random labeling as a rhetorical method always indicates that there is a popular prejudice to be appealed to.

  4. roger said

    Thanks for this very interesting collection of bits from Iranian websites, blogs & news. I’m always curious to see how and in what manner public opinion is formed from such a basis.
    I’ll look forward to seeing more of this objective presentation.
    -roger

  5. Sen said

    There are three items on my daily blog that illuminate the culture and mechanisms of anti-Bahaism in Iran:

    Gold merchants and Iran’s self-reinforcing anti-Bahaism
    The Blood Libe: Qom variant
    Secret Foreign Office documents show …

  6. Paul said

    Hi Sen Sonia and Family
    Paul here
    hope you’re all happy and well
    do you know the quote about young people and learning/…:something about it being better to be good and uneducated rather than not good and educated (?)
    jayyphoenix@yahoo.com

  7. Sen said

    Perhaps you are looking for this Paul:

    Training in morals and good conduct is far more important than book learning. A child that is cleanly, agreeable, of good character, well-behaved — even though he be ignorant — is preferable to a child that is rude, unwashed, ill-natured, and yet becoming deeply versed in all the sciences and arts. The reason for this is that the child who conducts himself well, even though he be ignorant, is of benefit to others, while an ill-natured, ill-behaved child is corrupted and harmful to others, even though he be learned. If, however, the child be trained to be both learned and good, the result is light upon light.
    (Selections from the Writings of Abdu’l-Baha, pp. 135-6)

    Thank you, we are all well, and happy too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 112 other followers

%d bloggers like this: